Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Midland National Bank and Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 1939No. 31,993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

After issues were joined by complaint, answer, and reply, defendant got judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff appeals.

The action is founded on a contract of pledge between E. Hugo Erickson and defendant. The subject matter was the certificate for valuable corporate stock. Defendant as pledgee made a sale which, we assume, was unauthorized. It purchased and still has the stock. Plaintiff’s leading claim is that there was a conversion. It is maintained also, in the alternative, that against a demurrer or motion for judgment on the pleadings the complaint states also a cause of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. GagnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Allen v. American Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Carpenter v. American Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Smith v. AltierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Norton v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. SorlienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. FligelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Manderson v. Fairview Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  4. Peterson v. SorlienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API