Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Thomas Franklin Shoe

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided January 15, 2004No. 02-02-00099-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

EX PARTE SHOE

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-02-099-CR

EX PARTE THOMAS FRANKLIN SHOE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

OPINION ON REMAND

------------

This case is before us on remand for consideration of the State’s contention that appellant pro se Thomas Franklin Shoe is estopped from arguing that his 1997 conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI) is illegal because he accepted the benefit of a fine not being assessed.

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant was convicted of DWI on October 16, 1997, and sentenced to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. People v. HesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API