Ex Parte Thomas Franklin Shoe
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
EX PARTE SHOE
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-02-099-CR
EX PARTE THOMAS FRANKLIN SHOE
------------
FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
OPINION ON REMAND
------------
This case is before us on remand for consideration of the State’s contention that appellant pro se Thomas Franklin Shoe is estopped from arguing that his 1997 conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI) is illegal because he accepted the benefit of a fine not being assessed.
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant was convicted of DWI on October 16, 1997, and sentenced to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- People v. HesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.