Legal Opinion

State v. Bakalov

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1993No. 930345PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The issue before us on this petition for certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals is whether defendant was denied the right to self-representation at his trial for the crime of rape. The opinion of the court of appeals can be found in State v. Bakalov, 849 P.2d 629 (Utah Ct.App.1993). Judge Jackson found no error and would have affirmed the conviction. Judge Orme would have remanded the ease to allow the trial court to enter findings, post hoc, on whether defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to assistance of counsel. Judge Greenwood, writing the lead opinion, would have…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BakalovCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BakalovUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  5. State v. RohwedderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API