Legal Opinion

State v. Rohwedder

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 20, 2018No. 20150357-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Judge:

¶1 Defendant Billy Lee Rohwedder appeals his convictions for theft by receiving stolen property, failure to respond to an officer's signal to stop, and failure to signal. Defendant argues that his right to a speedy trial was violated, that he was prejudiced by the trial court's requirement that he wear leg restraints during trial, and that he was denied his rights both to self-representation and the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

BACKGROUND 1

¶2 One evening in December 2011, an officer on patrol saw Defendant driving a vehicle that had been reported stolen. The officer…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  2. State v. BozarthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. State v. LeskyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  4. State v. BunkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. State v. MclainCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API