Legal Opinion

Grant v. City of Saco

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 2, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

The plaintiffs are sixty-seven school teachers employed in the Saco public school system. In November 1979, the plaintiffs, asserting a violation of 26 M.R.S.A. § 621 by the City of Saco, the Saco School Committee, and Howard Cushman, Superintendent of Schools, brought an action pursuant to 26 M.R.S.A. § 626 — A for unpaid wages.

Under section 621, certain employers are required to pay their employees within eight days of the time when the work is performed. 1 Section 626-A allows an em ployee to bring an action for violation of section 621 and if successful, receive a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parmelee Transportation Co. v. KeeshinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  2. William E. Burns v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
  3. Wright v. Superintending Sch. Com., City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. Winship v. Brewer School CommitteeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Blance v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. FO Bailey Co., Inc. v. Ledgewood, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Lord v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Hewins Travel Consultants, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. Department of Human Services v. MontySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API