Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dean

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 4, 1931No. 391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, District Judge.

This cause was board upon the petition of Prank Hill Smith, the plaintiff herein, praying recovery against Charles M. Dean, defendant, for $2,826.95, which it is alleged was illegally collected by Charles M. Dean as collector of internal revenue of the United States. The answer of the government denied that the tax was illegally collected. The case was tried before the court, a jury having been waived in writing. At the conclusion of the case the government made a motion for judgment on the evidence and the pleadings.

It appears from the evidence that the plaintiff, Prank…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Niles Bement Pond Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Red Wing Malting Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Connell v. HopkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herder v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API