In Re Acevedo
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
The relators, Jose Luis Acevedo and Lili Araceli Acevedo (the “Aeevedos”), seek mandamus relief from an order disqualifying Philip G. Bernal (“Bernal”) from representing the Aeevedos in an action against Walter Evans (“Evans”). We conclude that the trial court abused, its discretion in disqualifying Bernal based on the disqualification of the other attorneys in Bernal’s law firm due to their status as potential witnesses. Therefore, we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus, and we order the trial court to withdraw its orders disqualifying Bernal.
Factual And…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Brady v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Spears v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. GodbeyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re SchmitzTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re BahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Russ v. Titus Hospital District, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Johnson v. Fuselier, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- In the Guardianship of Erickson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.