Legal Opinion

Lushenko v. Lushenko

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1987No. 14546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

Plaintiff Betty Lushenko filed a two-count petition seeking: (1) the partition of certain real property allegedly held by her and defendant Ronald Lushenko as tenants in common, and (2) recovery of $240,000 as compensation for labor performed. Defendant filed a responsive pleading which appears to have been drawn pro se. Sundry matters were averred in this responsive pleading, including a request for reformation of certain deeds conveying the property sought to be partitioned. Various grounds for reformation were alleged.

Count II of the plaintiffs petition was dismissed prior to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lipton Realty, Inc. v. St. Louis Housing AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Armacost Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Gunn v. ThrustonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Greening v. KlamenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State Highway Commission v. KeeleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API