Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Keeley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1985No. 49317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the trial court dismissing appellant’s cause of action against defendant-respondent, Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of St. Louis, Inc.

Defendant-respondent, Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of St. Louis, Inc., employed defendant James Keeley as a maintenance supervisor. In this capacity, Keeley’s responsibilities included the maintenance of production line equipment and the direction of personnel. His duties did not include any repair or maintenance on automobiles.

On September 17, 1977, Leonard E. Richardson; vice president and director…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. Great Central Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Shell v. ShellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Luecke v. Missouri Department of ConservationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Greening v. KlamenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Payan ex rel. Payan v. HeiseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Speck v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. STATE EX REL. MO. HIGHWAY AND TRANSP. COM'N v. KeeleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Robinson v. May Department Stores Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State Highway Commission v. KeeleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. KeeleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API