Legal Opinion

Roof v. Blake

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1915No. Docket No. 132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kalamazoo; Stewart, J. Garnishment proceedings by Barney Roof against Horace A. Steuard and others as garnishees of William I. Blake. Marietta Blake was interpleaded as party claimant of the fund, and from a verdict directed in her favor plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This was an action in assumpsit brought by plaintiff against the principal defendants, who were copartners in business as Blake Bros., in which a judgment was recovered against them and in favor of plaintiff for the sum' of $452.16. At the time of the commencement of this suit, plaintiff sued out a writ of garnishment against Horace A Steuard, as garnishee defendant, to secure funds claimed to be in his hands belonging to William I. Blake, one of the principal defendants. Mr. Steuard made a disclosure in writing that at the time of the service of said writ he was indebted to said defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. Detroit Dry Dock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Farwell v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Meigs v. WellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Nachtegall v. ReilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Service Printing Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API