Legal Opinion
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1941No. 69Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
311 U.S. 579 (1941)
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP. ET AL.
v.
PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP ET AL.
No. 69.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 16, 17, 1940.
Decided January 6, 1941.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, with whom Solcitor General Biddle and Messrs. Richard H. Demuth, James F. Dealy, Clifford J. Durr, Hans A. Klagsbrunn, Charles M. McCarthy, J.M. Richardson Lyeth, and Emery H. Sykes were on the brief, for petitioners.
Mr. John Gerdes for respondents.
2Opinion of the Court · DouglasJustice Douglas
Dickinson Industrial Site v. Cowan, 309 U.S. 382, decided on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dickinson Industrial Site, Inc. v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Rorick v. Board of Comm'rs of Everglades Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.