Legal Opinion

Gould v. Sturman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The issue presented in this ease is whether there existed a valid decree which served to transfer title of the subject property in Newtown from the plaintiff to the defendants’ decedent. The record reveals the following background: The plaintiff and Henry Sturman, the defendants’ decedent, submitted certain claims to LaMacchia, J., sitting as an arbitrator. As a part of the arbitration settlement, the plaintiff promised to convey the subject property to the defendants’ decedent for the sum of $42,500. The arbitrator’s findings were subsequently confirmed by the court, Dube, J., in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson Electrical Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gauvin v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API