Legal Opinion

Bilby v. Hart-Parr Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 1924No. 14437PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This was an action by I-lart-Parr Company, against J. S. Bilby, originally brought to recover the sum of $5,100, as the purchase price of two tractors. After various dilatory pleas had been filed by the defendant, the plaintiff filed an amended petition, by which it abandoned its claim for the purchase price of said tractors, and sought to recover the sum of $1,428.56, as damages for breach of the contract of purchase. To this amended petition, the defendant filed a demurrer, and upon this being overruled, filed a motion to strike ce.rtain portions of the amended petition. This motion was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Romero v. HopewellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Coleman v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. City of Spokane v. CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Frazier v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Malone v. HundleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harmon v. NofireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Barrett v. SteeleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. McLeod v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Woofter v. Fourth Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Cardin v. Farmers Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API