Eversman v. Concrete Cutting & Breaking

I concur with the result of the majority opinion, though not its rationale. I write separately because the majority announces a rule that is impermissibly broad. Further, I would examine this case under MCL 418.301(1); MSA 17.237(301)(1)1 in addition to MCL 418.301(3); MSA 17.237(301)(3), and would address the issue whether the traveling employee doctrine should be adopted in Michigan.

i

Specifically, I disagree with the majority’s statements that “it is not necessary for us to decide whether to adopt the traveling employee doctrine,” and that “[r]egardless of whether Eversman was on a special…