Legal Opinion

D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 22, 1972No. [No. 205, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

For the want of a nail the shoe was lost,

For the want of a shoe the horse was lost,

For the want of a horse the rider was lost,

For the want of a rider the battle was lost,

For the want of a battle the kingdom was lost—

And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.

Poor Richard’s Almanac — Benjamin Franklin

Little things were translated into big things in this case where a 15 cent fare dispute resulted in the entry of a judgment which included $20,000 for punitive damages against appellant, D. C. Transit System, Inc. (D. C. Transit). It here appeals the punitive damage portion of that judgment. There…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BarrackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Sloan v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  3. Heinze v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  4. Drug Fair of Maryland, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Conklin v. SchillingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Montgomery Ward v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Bowden v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Siegman v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. General Motors Corp. v. PiskorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API