Seattle National Bank v. Ally
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King •county, Tallman, J., entered April 1, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, foreclosing and determining the priority of mortgages on real estate.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action was commenced by the Seattle National Bank, a corporation, against Raeffael Ally, Hattie P. Walcott, Emma L. Lichtenberg, and American Savings Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. On May 18, 1908, the defendant Raeffael Ally, a bachelor, executed and delivered to the defendant Hattie P. Walcott his two promissory notes, secured by a mortgage on real estate, in the city of Seattle. The mortgage was recorded on May 28, 1908. On June 5, 1908, Hattie P. Wal*611cott, for a valuable consideration, indorsed the notes and delivered them, with , the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Zent v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Howard v. ShawWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Summy v. RamseyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Fischer v. WoodruffWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Gottstein v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Lindsey v. DerbyshireWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Beckmann v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Ross v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Miller v. FrybergWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Cadwallader v. SprengleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.