Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. Hyde

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1904No. S.F. No. 3045PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Plaintiff sought in this action to recover the sum of five hundred dollars, in which amount he alleged the defendant was indebted to him on October 1, 1899, for rent of certain grazing-lands in Contra Costa County for the year commencing October 1, 1898. The answer of the defendant was a denial of all the allegations of the complaint. Judgment went for defendant, and from it and an order denying his motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals.

The court made a general finding in favor of defendant, which was, in effect, that he was not indebted to the plaintiff on October 1, 1899, or at any other…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cowell v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Swithenbank v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Bean v. KatsilometesIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Nishi v. InoguchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. 65282 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API