Legal Opinion

Schelly v. Schwank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1895No. 4672PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Madison county. Tried below before Powers, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Madison county by defendant in error against George Davis, and in the petition it was alleged, in substance, that on the 13th day of May, 1886, the firm of Wiegand & Stratman was indebted to .defendant in error in the sum of $400, and executed and delivered to him for said amount a note and a mortgage of certain personal property to secure its payment, and on the next day defendant in error, or George Dopson, his agent, took possession of the mortgaged chattels and advertised them for sale, or was proceeding in the regular manner to foreclose…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Uhlig v. BarnumNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Jenkins v. MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hewitt v. Commercial Banking Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Murphy v. GouldNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Houston v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanover Fire Insurance v. StoddardNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Blue Valley Lumber Co. v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API