Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. American Transit Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) to recover on two unsatisfied judgments entered against the defendant’s insureds, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated June 10, 2003, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) to recover on two unsatisfied judgments they obtained against the defendant’s insureds on default. In its answer, the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Sirota v. KloogmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Braddy v. Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bahnuk v. Countryway Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  2. Shattuck v. Dryden Mut. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API