State v. LaPlante
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.
Karie LaPlante appeals from a judgment, entered following a jury trial, adjudging her guilty of violating § 940.34, STATS., "the failure to aid" statute.
LaPlante raises two issues of error for our review: (1) whether § 940.34, STATS., is unconstitutionally vague; and (2) whether § 940.34, as applied under the facts of this case, violates her right against self-incrimination. Because § 940.34 is not unconstitutionally vague, and because its application here does not violate LaPlante’s right against self-incrimination, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On January 14, 1992, a party was held at LaPlante's…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PittmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SchulzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WickstromCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RevelsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012