Legal Opinion

State v. LaPlante

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 19, 1994No. 93-1672-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.

Karie LaPlante appeals from a judgment, entered following a jury trial, adjudging her guilty of violating § 940.34, STATS., "the failure to aid" statute.

LaPlante raises two issues of error for our review: (1) whether § 940.34, STATS., is unconstitutionally vague; and (2) whether § 940.34, as applied under the facts of this case, violates her right against self-incrimination. Because § 940.34 is not unconstitutionally vague, and because its application here does not violate LaPlante’s right against self-incrimination, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 14, 1992, a party was held at LaPlante's…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. PittmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. SchulzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. WickstromCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RevelsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  2. State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API