Hutson v. Long Bell Lumber Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, District Judge.
In the answer filed in each of these consolidated cases is contained the following paragraph: “For a further, separate and distinct defense in point of law arising upon the face of the said amended bill of complaint herein, these defendants say that the facts alleged in said amended bill of complaint are insufficient to constitute a valid cause of action in equity.”
The issue thus made, considered as equivalent to a motion to dismiss, has been presented and submitted upon oral and written argument, and is now for decision.
As to each of the two bills, defendants contend…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- D. K. Porter, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Abe Greenband v. Woodey B. Searle and Edlean E. SearleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Wilkinson v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. American Taxicabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2000