Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davidson v. Bucklew

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1992No. 91-T-4613Published

1DissentNadek, Judge

The lead opinion finds error in the denial of the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. This holding is based upon the public policy favoring arbitration, the belief that the arbitration contract is ambiguous, and the existence of an adequate remedy at law.

Appellee filed an action for declaratory judgment. In conjunction, appellee prayed for injunctive relief preventing the arbitration panel from reconvening. Clearly, the declaration of the rights of the parties to' an arbitration agreement sets forth a proper claim for relief under R.C. Chapter 2711.

The lead opinion cites the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Nancy W. McGinnis v. E.F. Hutton and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 20 v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State, Ex Rel. Williams v. Belpre City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API