Legal Opinion

Miller v. Smoot

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1939No. 6 Div. 444PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainant’s bill is for an accounting by the defendant as her trusted agent.

Defendant’s letter to complainant, which is set out in the bill, acknowledges receipt of described securities (preferred stock), which he is to handle for complainant, sell and hypothecate, and reinvest as he sees fit, but with a condition that if loss follows, he will pay complainant the amount “realized therefrom, together with interest at the rate of eight per centum (8%) per an-num from the date of sale.” This agreement bears date of October 26, 1937, and it appears that on October 25th,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. McKellerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Elledge v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Ingram v. People's Finance Thrift Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Acuff v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Washington v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smoot v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Smith v. PettySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Westbrook v. Inglenook First Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API