Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1941No. Nos. 2213, 2219PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

The defendants below, Joel E. Rosenberg and William C. Uphoff, were convicted of *936using the mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud, in violation of section 215 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 338. The indictment charged that Uphoff sold to C. W. Harber a one-half interest in an oil and gas lease covering 120 acres of land in New Mexico for $60; that thereafter Rosenberg pretended to offer Harber $7.50 per acre and later $25 per acre for his interest in the lease; that both defendants represented to Harber that more money could be had by drilling a well on a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Vernon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. MacKett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  5. Freeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Thomas Howard, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. CrummerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  5. Rice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API