Legal Opinion

People v. Palmer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2006No. 98333PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald

Justices Freeman, McMorrow, and Kilbride concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Garman concurred in part and dissented in part, with opinion, joined by Chief Justice Thomas and Justice Karmeier.

OPINION

A jury convicted defendant, Nathan Palmer, of eight Class X offenses for actions committed over an approximately two-hour period in the home of M. J. and D. J. on Sunday afternoon July 18, 1999. After finding that defendant had received two prior serious felony convictions within a 20-year period, the circuit court of Kane County adjudged defendant an habitual criminal. The court imposed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. ArnaIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. CrespoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Krautsack v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. PetrenkoIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. Jaime P.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. SpearsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API