Legal Opinion

People v. Petrenko

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2010No. 107503 RelPublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Kilbride, Gar-man, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Freeman specially concurred, with opinion.

Justice Burke concurred in part and dissented in part, with opinion.

OPINION

This case presents two issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in summarily dismissing defendant’s pro se postconviction petition as frivolous and patently without merit, and (2) whether the imposition of a 10-year prison term consecutive to a natural-life prison term was void in this case.

BACKGROUND

Following a jury trial, defendant, Shawn Petrenko, was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. EnglishIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. CatheyIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. LigonIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. McGheeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API