Legal Opinion

State v. Clement

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1999No. WD 55478PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.

Defendant-Appellant, Freddie L. Clement, was convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202 RSMo 1994. On appeal, Defendant claims, and the State concedes, that the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to permit defense counsel to ask members of the jury panel whether they would draw a negative inference if Defendant failed to testify. We agree that Defendant was entitled to make such an inquiry and, therefore, the conviction must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.1

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. FeltropSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. State v. GranberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. State v. DavenportMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. FinchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. GlasperIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. James v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. BusseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API