Hopkins v. Washington County
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district, court of Washington county. Tried below before Keysor, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.
During the course of erection under contract, the various stipulations and conditions of which we need not particularly notice of a court house for Washington county, Richards & Co., the contractors, had purchased of the Paxton &.Yierling Iron Works material, to be used in the performance of the work, and in the transaction *597of the furnishing and sale of such material, and evidencing a portion or all of the indebtedness thus created, Richards & Co. executed and delivered to the Paxton & Vierling Iron Works promissory notes, which were duly assigned to the plaintiff herein, and it is alleged in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cropsey v. WiggenhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Wilcox v. SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- Turner v. AlthausNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- German Fire Insurance v. Bullene, Moore, Emery & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Harrington v. Butte & Boston Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Wright v. BarneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Rhoads v. Columbia Fire Underwriters AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Parsons Construction Co. v. GiffordNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Beatrice v. Gage CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.