Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sullivan, J.

On this appeal we are called upon to determine whether a parolee is in custody so as to trigger the ameliorative provisions of the last paragraph of Penal Law § 70.30 (3). We hold that this paragraph is only applicable when a defendant is in actual custody. Accordingly, the Supreme Court, Queens County, properly dismissed the proceeding (132 Misc 2d 45). To the extent that our prior decision in Henderson v Reid (79 AD2d 1019) would indicate otherwise, we decline to follow it.

The facts in this case are set forth in the dissenting opinion. The pertinent portion…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McGrath v. KristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. People ex rel. Wilder v. MarkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . ScrughamNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Kalamis v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People Ex Rel. Natoli v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coaxum v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Poole v. KoehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Crimmins v. DennisonNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Poole v. KoehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Wallace v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API