State v. Hoagland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS H. GODFREY, Jr., Justice. *
This is a consolidated appeal taken by defendants Joseph Hoagland, Jon Hoag-land, and Duane Ferdig, each of whom was convicted by a jury of obstructing legal process, in violation of Minn.St. 609.50. During trial the defendants admitted interfering with an investigation by state conservation officers of suspected game violations at the Hoagland farm, but contended they were entitled to do so because the proposed search was illegal. We affirm.
On the evening of October 15, 1976, a state conservation officer was parked out of sight on a gravel road near the Joseph…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Augustine FerroneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Bryce McDowell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. KittlesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Matter of Welfare of BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- City of St. Louis Park v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.