Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Board of Education & Great Neck Teachers Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
A Great Neck teacher claims back
pay on the grounds that she was not given appropriate service credit for two previous years’ substitute teaching experience when hired full time in September, 1967. The Great Neck Board of Education seeks here to stay the arbitration of that claim demanded under their collective bargaining agreement of July 1, 1971.
Thé board recognizes the validity of the agreement to arbitrate, but contends that (1) as a matter of interpretation, the agreement to arbitrate does not apply retroactively to a 1967 hiring; and (2) since under section 3813 of the Education Law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Winbush v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. New York Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Todd v. Board of Education of the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Aloi v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Chem Construction Corp. v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Amsterdam v. HelsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1983