Legal Opinion

Urso v. Prudential Ins. Co.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided November 23, 2004No. CV-03-024-JDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Urso v. Prudential Ins. Co. CV-03-024-JD 11/23/04 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Wayne Urso v. Civil No. 03-024-JD Opinion No.

2004 DNH 167

Prudential Insurance Company of America O R D E R Wayne Urso brings suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1984 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., challenging the decision made by Prudential Insurance Company of America to discontinue his long-term disability benefits. Prudential moves for summary judgment, contending that its decision was properly made and that Urso failed to exhaust the remedies…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.