Martin v. Judd

This bill was to set aside a redemption of the lands in controversy, and for an injunction to restrain the plaintiff in error from taking a deed under the sale subsequently made.

The land had previously been sold as the property of Andrew Hoagland, on an execution issued out of this court, on a judgment for costs, in the ease of Mansfield v. Hoagland et al., and at such sale the defendant in error became the purchaser.

The right to the relief claimed, is based on the ground that the judgment upon which the redemption was made was fraudulently obtained by the plaintiff in error, by collusion…