Plant v. Howard Johnson's Motor Lodge, 294 Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
Transfer denied.
2DissentPivarnik, Justice
I dissent to the majority's denial of transfer brought by Defendants-Appellees Howard Johnson's Motor Lodge. While I agree that entry of summary judgment by the trial court was inappropriate because of the particular facts of this case, I am disturbed by the holding of the Court of Appeals.
The Legislature has addressed an innkeeper's liability for the property of its guests. Ind. Code Ann. § 32-8-28-2 (Burns Supp.1987). I agree with the Court of Appeals that this statute does not apply in the instant case since the statute is directed to property brought…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Hammond v. AllegrettiIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Robertson Bros. Dept. Store v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Silvestro v. WalzIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Fennema v. Howard Johnson Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Numismatic Enterprises v. Hyatt Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992