Legal Opinion

Silvestro v. Walz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1943No. 27,915PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.

Appellee recovered judgment on a verdict for $1,400 on account of personal injuries sustained by falling down an unguarded stairway in appellant’s shop. All the errors relied upon are specified in the motion for new trial. By the verdict the jury determined against appellant the issues that appellee was an invitee, appellant was negligent, and appellee free from negligence proximately contributing to his injury. Ordinarily these are questions of fact for the jury. We are asked to hold as a matter of law that each issue was erroneously determined. To reach such conclusion we must be able to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Montague v. HansonMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Pfisterer v. KeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Palmer v. Boston Penny Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hammond v. AllegrettiIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Robertson Bros. Dept. Store v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. RUST v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Hundt v. La Crosse Grain Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Rouch v. BisigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API