Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2012No. 26248PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Sarah Elizabeth Schmidt was charged by an indictment dated July 1, 2010 with ten counts of grand theft, in violation of SDCL 22-30A-1 and 22-30A-17(1); three counts of identity theft, in violation of SDCL 22-40-8; and sixty-seven counts of forgery, in violation of SDCL 22-39-36. Pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, Schmidt pleaded guilty but mentally ill to ten counts of grand theft, a Class 4 felony, on May 26, 2011. Schmidt filed a motion to withdraw her guilty but mentally ill pleas prior to sentencing. The motion was denied. Schmidt was sentenced to ten…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. BonnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CeplechaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Golliher-WeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. KvasnickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. MartinezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API