People v. Speight
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Eric Dayshawn Speight appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of premeditated, willful, and deliberate attempted murder and found true various enhancements. Speight argues the following: (1) the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct when she misstated the law concerning homicide and the error was compounded by the trial court’s statements and omission of an instruction on the interaction between attempted murder and attempted voluntary manslaughter, and (2) his sentence was cruel and unusual punishment and he received ineffective assistance of counsel…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- People v. Baker, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Franklin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Turner, California Court of Appeal, 1st District2016
- CERVANTES NUNEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- (HC) Arevalo v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.