Legal Opinion

Bonafield v. Cahill

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 7, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

127 N.J. Super. 149 (1974)

316 A.2d 705

JAMES J. BONAFIELD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM T. CAHILL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND RONALD M. HEYMANN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND JOHN J. FRANCIS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 19, 1974.

Decided March 7, 1974.

Before Judges CONFORD, MEANOR and BOTTER.

Mr. Harvey Weissbard argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Isles & Weissbard, attorneys; Mr. Daniel E. Isles, of counsel).

Mr. I. Leo Motiuk, Deputy Attorney…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bonafield v. CahillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. Plaza FordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Grzankowski v. HeymannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. In Re BonafieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. McLean v. S & L STEEL CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API