Legal Opinion

Grzankowski v. Heymann

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 31, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

128 N.J. Super. 563 (1974)

321 A.2d 262

JOSEPH A. GRZANKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

RONALD M. HEYMANN, NEW JERSEY COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 1, 1974.

Decided May 31, 1974.

Before Judges CONFORD, HANDLER and MEANOR.

Mr. Thomas F. Shebell, Jr. argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. I. Leo Motiuk, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANDLER, J.A.D.

Appellant is a judge of compensation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loboda v. Township of ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  2. DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF STATE v. CruzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Russo v. Governor of State of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Russo v. WalshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Bonafield v. CahillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Irvington General Hsp. v. Dept. of HealthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Division of Youth & Family Services v. P.M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. In the Matter of County of Atlantic and Pba Local 243 AndNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API