Legal Opinion

Matter of Thrasher

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1996No. 49S00-9310-DI-1170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

On October 26,1993, the Disciplinary Commission filed a verified complaint for disciplinary action alleging that the respondent violated rules 5.4(c), 1.8(f), 5.5(b), 1.1, 1.4(b), 3.3(a)(1), and 8.4(c) of the Bules of Profes sional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. 1 This case now comes before this Court upon the duly-appointed hearing officer’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, in which he concludes that the respondent, John E. Thrasher, engaged in misconduct as charged.

In attorney disciplinary cases, our review is de novo in nature, and we remain the final arbiter of…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Matter of HuebnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matter of StantonIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Matter of ClaninIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Matter of FroschIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Contempt of the Supreme Court of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re FlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API