Legal Opinion · Dissent

Auburndale Freezer Corp., and Minute Maid Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1970No. 28522_1Published

1DissentWisdom, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

I

The line between legitimate primary and unlawful secondary activity is relatively easy to draw where the primary and secondary employers have separate work-sites. A more difficult problem is presented in the common situs cásese “where both the struck employer and ‘secondary’ or ‘neutral’ employers are *1223carrying on business activities.” Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 1969, 394 U.S. 369, 388, 89 S.Ct. 1109, 22 L.Ed.2d 344. As the Board observed, “[i]n determining whether or not the Auburndale warehouse is a common situs the question is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Local 761, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United Steelworkers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 480, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API