Legal Opinion
Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 14, 1963No. 17058PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This case raises novel questions concerning the proper construction and application of Section 8(b) (7) (C) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (7) (C) (Supp. IV, 1959-62), added by Section 704(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 73 Stat. 519, 544 (sometimes referred to as the Landrum-Griffin Act). That section provides, in relevant part, that it is an unfair labor practice for a labor organization:
“(7) to picket or cause to be picketed * * * any employer where an .object thereof is forcing or requiring an employer to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hughes v. Superior Court of Cal. for Contra Costa Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963