Legal Opinion

United States v. Paar

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1926No. 2798PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellee contends that his importation, sheet gelatin treated, in. hydrochloric acid, should be classified as entered — a manufacture-wholly or in chief value of gelatin, at the rate- of 25 per centum, ad valorem under the last clause of paragraph 42 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

The collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles- described! the; merchandise as gelatin in sheets, and assessed it for duty at the-rate of-20 per centum ad valorem and 7 cents per pound, under the-fourthi clause of said paragraph, which is as follows:.Par. 42. Edible gelatin, valued at less than 40 cents per pound,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  3. American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Young v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API