United States v. Paar
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
Appellee contends that his importation, sheet gelatin treated, in. hydrochloric acid, should be classified as entered — a manufacture-wholly or in chief value of gelatin, at the rate- of 25 per centum, ad valorem under the last clause of paragraph 42 of the Tariff Act of 1922.
The collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles- described! the; merchandise as gelatin in sheets, and assessed it for duty at the-rate of-20 per centum ad valorem and 7 cents per pound, under the-fourthi clause of said paragraph, which is as follows:.Par. 42. Edible gelatin, valued at less than 40 cents per pound,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Young v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966