Legal Opinion
City of Melbourne v. Puma
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 9, 1993No. 92-1038PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
616 So.2d 190 (1993)
CITY OF MELBOURNE, Appellant,
v.
Joseph Albert PUMA, Appellee.
No. 92-1038.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 9, 1993.
Paul R. Gougelman, III and Michael R. Riemenschneider of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, for appellant.
Ralph Geilich, Melbourne, for appellee.
2Per curiam
Affirmed on the authority of Snyder v. Board of County Commissioners, 595 So.2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), juris. accepted, 605 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1992). See also ABG Real Estate Development Company of Florida, Inc. v. St. Johns County, 608 So.2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).
AFF…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Snyder v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- ABG Real Estate Dev. v. ST. JOHNS CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
4Cited by3 opinions
- Martin County v. YusemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- City of Melbourne v. PumaSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- City of Melbourne v. PumaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994