Legal Opinion

City of Melbourne v. Puma

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 1994No. 92-1038PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We consider the present case after the Florida Supreme Court remanded our decision in City of Melbourne v. Puma, 616 So.2d 190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), for further consideration consistent with Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So.2d 469 (Fla.1993). City of Melbourne v. Puma, 630 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1994).

After a non-jury trial, the trial court, based upon our decision in Snyder,1 ordered the City of Melbourne either to grant the request of Joseph Albert Puma to have his property rezoned and the City’s Comprehensive Plan amended accordingly,2 or to hold an evidentiary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF BREVARD v. SnyderSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Snyder v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. City of Melbourne v. PumaSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. City of Melbourne v. PumaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin County v. YusemSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API