Legal Opinion

Schmid v. Baum's Home of Flowers, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1931PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

The appeal of Schmid, trustee, and H. T. Kern, receiver, involves a contest with regard to rent of real estate of a bankrupt, accruing after the date of bankruptcy. Baum’s Home of Flowers, the tenant, leased a portion of a business house in Knoxville from Morris Bart-, in February, 1925, the contract being evidenced by a written lease providing for a term of fifteen years, beginning July 1, 1925, with monthly rent payable on the first day of each month, in advance. At the date of th* lease Bart was the owner of the building, subject only to an express vendor’s lien for unpaid purchase money.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lieberman, Loveman Cohn v. KnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Winnisimmet Trust, Inc. v. LibbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Morgan Bros. v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brier Hill Collieries v. GerntTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. First National Bank of Sparta v. YowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Valley National Bank of Ariz. v. Avco Develop. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Hahn v. VerretNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Smith v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Mullins v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API