Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1964No. 40353PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as “defendants”, and the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to by name, or as “plaintiff”, are adjoining home owners in' Tulsa,' Oklahoma. Plaintiff’s home is at 4520 W. 56th Street, and was described in her deed as the WV2 of Lot 2 in Block 1, Bozarth Acres. Defendants’ residence number is “4524” on that Street, and its legal description is Lot 3 of the same block.

The principal issue in this action was whether the fence line, or the survey line, should be the governing boundary line between the two properties. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Rock Springs v. SturmWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Forde v. LibbyWyoming Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. MacIas v. Guymon Industrial FoundationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Flagg v. FaudreeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Threet v. PolkCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API