Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Beto

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 19, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 63-H-312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANNAY, District Judge.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Title 28, U.S.C.A., Section 2241 et seq., upon which leave to proceed in forma pauperis was heretofore granted.

The Petition was denied by this Court’s Memorandum and Order filed May 3, 1963. Petitioner filed his Motion for Rehearing on May 13, 1963. As the Petition presents issues as to arrest and search and seizure without a warrant and upon probable cause, the Motion for Rehearing was granted November 7, 1963, for reconsideration in light of Ker v. State of California, 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623, 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (Decided June 10,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Mack Barnes v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Eric Jerome MacK v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  4. Eric Jerome MacK v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  5. MacKie's Automotive, Inc. v. Mike Parks, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API