Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Garcia

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 16, 2012No. 2009-KA-1578Published

1DissentWeimer, J.

|,In our adversarial system of justice, each side is represented by opposing counsel. No matter how abhorrent the crime, for that system of justice to function properly, conflict free counsel is essential.

To that end, this court and the United States Supreme Court have set forth certain standards for counsel with which our trial courts must comply. Here, the majority of this court has selected the wrong standards, in no small measure due to the fact that the majority’s analysis begins with a false premise: “at no point before trial did the issue of conflict of interest arise.” Op’n, p. 28.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API