Legal Opinion
United States v. Emspak
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 31, 1951No. 1742-1753, 1796, 1797, 1799, 1785, 1786, 1787, 1824PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKLAND, District Judge.
The first sixteen above-named defendants were indicted 'by the Grand Jury of this Court for contempt of Congress, 2 U.S.C. A. § 192, for failure to answer questions before a duly created sub-committee of the Committee on Un-American Activities of the House of Representatives, pursuant to Section 121(b) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, subsection (q) (2), Rules of House of Representatives, rule 11, 60 Stat. 828, and House Resolution 5 of the 81st Congress; the last three above-named defendants were indicted by the Grand Jury of this Court for contempt of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marcello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. OrmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- I. Charles Baker v. Thomas S. Eisenstadt, Sheriff of Suffolk CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Quinn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Di CarloDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.